| |
|
Is
a pacifist security possible?
There are local and global
alternatives that may give
meaning to pacifist and security
policies and that, besides, are
coherent with culture of peace
and human security.
Yet, today very few
resources are invested to build
lasting peace. |
|
|
 |
It is shocking that we
have many tools like a Ministry of Defense
and NATO to
wage war, but few to make
peace. |
Ainhoa Ruiz |
| |
After the arrival of
NATO, there is nothing left of the countries
NATO is an organization that is, to say the least, questionable, among other
things. It violates international humanitarian law and the Charter of
the
United Nations, as happened with the bombings in Yugoslavia, and has
destabilized different countries such as Iraq, Syria or Afghanistan. |
|
|
|
|
NATO is an organization
that generates tension and leaves devastated
every country through which it passes. |
Ainhoa Ruiz |
| |
|
The way to build
security has to be different. We
have to start looking for other
options, and those options go
through
peace. |
|
|
| |
Our general message:
this way of
building security is useless, because it
is generating more wars.
In the case of
the Ukraine war, it would be naive to
ignore NATO’s role in putting pressure
on other countries.
All
NATO is
proposing is more tension. |
|
|
|
|
We have to start looking
for new ways to build security, and those options go
through
peace. |
Ainhoa Ruiz |
|
|
|
|
